Sberbank is one of the companies slated for privatisation Source: ITAR-TASS
takes in 11 state-run companies will be offered starting next year, and the sales will proceed even if state revenues outpace expectations, economics minister Elvira Nabiullina said during a budget meeting.
The timing and size of the sales – the largest since the controversial loans-for-shares privatisations in the mid-1990s – are yet to be settled. But foreign investors said they were encouraged by the focus on restructuring the economy and raising funds, rather than just unloading property.
“The privatisations should not just be a fiscal matter and not so much oriented toward raising funds for the budget, although that's also important,” Nabiullina said. “They are in large part a way for us to influence the structure of the economy.”
Any changes to the list of companies will be made before a draft budget is submitted to the Duma, she added.
Nabiullina conceded that the government has not yet arrived at a revenue forecast for the sales, although she said the Economic Development Ministry expected earnings of 600bn to 700bn roubles (916.4bn INR-1069bn INR) from 2011 to 2013.
Finance minister Alexei Kudrin, who is usually more conservative than Nabiullina in his forecasts, estimated privatisation revenues at 883bn roubles (1348.65bn INR) during a meeting with Prime Minister Vladimir Putin – a figure that business newspaper Vedomosti estimated could eventually become twice as high.
The Finance Ministry presented an updated list of companies, which dropped Russian Railways and the Mortgage Lending Agency (AIZhK). The state will retain controlling stakes of at least 50pc plus one share in the companies.
Investors and analysts said the discrepancies in the ministry’s estimates and the shuffling of the list were natural and would likely persist as the government refines its plans.
It is very difficult to predict privatisation revenues,” said Liam Halligan, chief economist at Prosperity Capital Management, “especially when the market constantly changes and you do not know whether you will actually sell your stake and at what price.”
The ministries did not have enough time to discuss the details, and media coverage has added hype to the sales, said Yaroslav Lissovolik, chief economist at Deutsche Bank Russia. Despite the lack of firm plans, analysts welcomed the movement toward privatisation, calling it a positive sign for Russia’s investment climate and the overall economic situation.
“In general, privatisation is a good thing for Russia…” said Halligan. “I absolutely believe that the government wants to lower its stake in the economy. There have been lurches and some regress, of course, but overall, over the past 10 years, the state has been stepping back.”
The economic crisis left the government with a much broader presence in the economy and influence on the market. State banks helped industry refinance its debt to foreign lenders and even bought shares on the open market to help support falling stock prices.
Those measures, which helped avert a deeper economic fall, were generally welcomed by the market as a temporary digression from the government’s path toward a reduced role in the economy.
The main question now, analysts say, is whether the state will break its habit of maintaining control over the country’s largest corporations.
“Overall this [privatisation] is positive for private investors, but some uncertainty remains, as the government plans to retain controlling stakes in these companies,” said Marina Shestakova, deputy chief investment officer on listed assets at Wermuth Asset Management.
Investors also fear that dumping large stakes on the market could negatively affect prices for companies that are already traded. And while some of the 11 companies on the list might yet be removed, the importance of the privatisation message would not be diminished, Halligan said.
“The $29bn is an unrealisable sum for the domestic market,” Shestakova said. “So the Russian government will have to attract foreign investors.
"But I would be oriented toward Asia, and not the U.S. or Europe. Maybe China or India," she said.
But for foreigners to come, Russia will need to work on improving its investor climate, analysts agreed. Bringing clarity to its taxation plans for natural resources companies and increasing transparency would be a good start.
Foreigners would not want to invest in companies where it is unclear how money is spent, Shestakova said.
The government looks determined to make the sales happen, which will mean finding a way to ease investors’ concerns, Lissovolik said. “The need for additional sources of financing is strong, so they will not pull back," he said.
Originally published in The Moscow Times
All rights reserved by Rossiyskaya Gazeta.