Drawing by Niyaz Karim
Readers hardly need to be reminded of how “bad” nationalists
are supposed to be: an aggressive crowd clamouring against the presence in
their country of people of a different ethnicity, faith, or skin colour is the
conventional image of this social phenomenon perpetuated by the mass media.
But how do good nationalists look? Do they even exist at all, or is this
phenomenon doomed to exist forever with only a negative aura?
The Russian press, and the European press too, constantly carry stories of
attacks on immigrants. The notorious phrase, “Here they come,” ever popular
among the angry citizens of major Russian metropolitan areas, is clear evidence
of permanently rising tensions in society regarding all kinds of newcomers. That
said, many nationalistic incidents have nothing at all to do with the arrival
of “aliens” in Russia – ie, citizens of former Soviet republics who come here
in search of jobs.
According to the statistics, just as many nationalism-
related conflicts occur
between Russian citizens of different ethnic backgrounds. Many Russian
politicians consider the latter to be the most disturbing development. The
conflict between so-called native Russians, mostly perceived by public opinion
to be residents of European Russia, regardless of their affiliation with a
particular national republic, and people from Russia’s North Caucasus, has
risen to the forefront of attention at the highest political level.
This happened several months ago when the police illegally freed a murder
suspect, formerly from that area, hours after detaining him. This sparked a
mass riot among football fans from whose ranks the victim came. The fans staged
an unsanctioned rally under nationalist slogans at Manezh Square in Moscow. The
country’s leaders had to intervene to ensure the suspect was rearrested and the
case against him prosecuted.
In many cases, unrest is caused not so much by an abstract hatred that Russians
supposedly feel towards people of other ethnicities as by an understandable indignation
at social inequality, corruption, or lack of trust in the justice system. The
implications of such reactions are disquieting, and not only for Russia. The
abandonment of multiculturalist policies by a number of European countries and
a serious upsurge in ratings of not just national but also of far-right
nationalist parties has threatened the United Europe project from within. In
fact, restoring erstwhile borders fully or partly, banning new immigrants from
entry, and expelling those who are already in residence are all measures being
contemplated. Judging by local election results, a considerable portion of
Europeans are no longer happy with life in different ethnic and cultural
“tents” under one roof in a single European home.
Certain commentators believe that the further growth of nationalist sentiment
will inevitably lead to radicalisation, not only of the right, but also of the
left wing of the European political spectrum – ie bringing about parties that
oppose nationalists. This will gradually squeeze moderate political parties out
of power in Europe.
But is it even possible to confront nationalism in a democracy, given the
obvious appeal and often sophistication of this ideology?
A number of Russians believe that the Soviet experience of promoting
“friendship among peoples” at the state level can be drawn upon to fight
nationalist tendencies. Those programmes were well funded and the policy of
cadre rotation between representatives of various ethnic groups within the
country was a normal practice.
At the same time, the state, emboldened by its ideological monopoly, suppressed
any unauthorised manifestations, chiefly those of ethnic nationalism in the
republics. Admittedly, friendship among peoples didn’t stop the USSR from
breaking up along ethnic lines, the implication being that this experience
cannot serve as a benchmark for modern states.
That said, many Russians are still unprepared to paint nationalism exclusively
black as a cultural and social phenomenon. They believe the threat comes from
interpretations that are capable of generating xenophobic feelings of a
religious, or racial nature. Provided such pathologies are promptly nipped in
the bud, moderate nationalism should remain part of any political system.
Russian researchers consider such nationalism to espouse an entire nation’s
right to political self-determination, as opposed to just a part of any nation,
and believe that such sentiments shape a society’s skills as a civilisation.
Fear of any manifestations of nationalism is driving this phenomenon
underground. It is also very quickly forming gangs of radical thugs who by
their aggressive actions are forcing the subject of “legitimate” nationalism
that exists for the benefit of the state to the margins of mainstream politics.
Yevgeny Shestakov is editor of the international politics desk at Rossiyskaya Gazeta.
All rights reserved by Rossiyskaya Gazeta.
Subscribe
to our newsletter!
Get the week's best stories straight to your inbox