Not out of the woods yet

No one knows yet how and when what Harvard professor Ken Rogoff calls the “great contraction” will end. Some predict a new global recession starting with Europe and the United States. Even the normally cautious International Monetary Fund has not been mincing its words, with new managing director Christine Lagarde
saying we are entering a dangerous new phase.

How can Russia, which is so vulnerable to oil price changes and capital flow surges, try to steer a steady policy course in the face of such uncertainty? There are no easy answers.

It seems that the usual recourse to international policy coordination has faded from view, with each country trying to find its own solution.

Russia, unlike fellow BRIC members Brazil, India and China, has no capital account restrictions, and the ruble is completely convertible. This is probably the main reason that the Russian economy suffered such a devastating blow relative to the others as the financial crisis erupted in late 2008. Credit fled banks almost everywhere, but in Russia, it also left the country.

It would seem that, short of backtracking on its commitment to an open economy, Russia really has no choice but to create buffers by pursuing macroeconomic policies that should be even more prudent than usual. In some ways, it has. After falling to almost $380 billion in early 2009, foreign exchange reserves are now at $545 billion. A budget deficit of almost 6 percent of gross domestic product in 2009 is likely to be about in balance this year, admittedly thanks in part to higher oil prices. And, importantly, gross public debt is less than 10 percent of G.D.P. this year, according to the I.M.F. ’s latest published data, whereas it stands at almost 18 percent in China, 80 percent in Germany and 142 percent in Greece.

In one area in particular, and despite progress, the effort is insufficient. This has to do with inflation. After averaging 8.8 percent in 2009 and again in 2010, the year-on-year increase in the Russian consumer price index registered 9 percent to 10 percent between January and July. Only last month did the rate of inflation decline to 8.2 percent, and it is likely to decline further to about 6.5 percent by year’s end.

But this is still just not good enough — not in this volatile global environment. The problem is that Russia’s inflation rate is still much too high in the context of a global low-inflation environment. Over time, the ruble is losing the competitive margin it gained. If an inflationary wedge continues vis-à-vis Russia’s main trading partners, the time will come when an overvalued ruble comes under speculative attack, joining the other cases of financial fragility that have been too much in evidence lately.

Before suggesting a policy 
response, we need to understand why Russia continues to have such stubbornly high rates of inflation relative to others.

Analysts everywhere, in seeking to explain inflation, write reams about structural labor markets and wage conditions, infrastructure bottlenecks, industrial monopolies, as well as excess demand, say, stemming from too much government spending. All of these issues may matter at the margin in Russia, but what really matters is money growth that is excessive relative to demand. The point is simple: Russian inflation was running at almost 10 percent through July because the stock of money was expanding at more than 20 percent on a year-on-year basis. Inflation in other major emerging markets such as China, India and Brazil was lower because broad money was growing much more slowly in their economies.

For Russia, broad money rose 22 percent in the year to August. With real G.D.P. growth of less than 5 percent in 2011, it is hardly surprising that inflation should still be so high. In fact, the rapid growth of the money stock would be consistent with an even higher inflation rate, but presumably the difference reflects a higher demand for rubles generally. In a global crisis, ruble demand could plummet as investors and savers seek safe havens such as the U.S. dollar and even gold.

As in other countries, there is no inherent reason that Russia should not target an inflation rate of about 2 percent. It is a policy decision. The Central Bank must tighten its monetary policy accordingly, or Russia will remain exposed when — not if — the next global financial crisis erupts.

Martin Gilman, a former I.M.F. representative in Russia, teaches at the Higher School of Economics in Moscow.

Originally published at the Moscow Times. 

All rights reserved by Rossiyskaya Gazeta.