The world pins hopes on Russia's Northern Sea Route. Pictured: The port zone in Sovetskaya Gavan in Khabarovsk, Russian's Far East. Source: RIA Novosti / Alexander Lyskin
Economic considerations, as well as matters of security, are increasingly causing the international community to eye Russia’s Northern Sea Route as a viable alternative to traditional sea freight lines. The route links Europe to the Pacific, providing faster, cheaper transit in that direction than shipping lanes through the Suez or Panama canals.
The Northern Sea Route is Russia’s historic, national transport system along the Arctic seas. It is the shortest maritime route between Europe and the Asia-Pacific, allowing for significantly faster transit times than the traditional freight lines across the southern seas. It is also much safer, piracy being completely impossible in its waters.
Advantages of the Northern Sea Route
The Northern Sea Route passes through the Arctic Ocean’s Barents, Kara, Laptev, East Siberian and Chukchi seas, as well as through parts of the Pacific Ocean’s Bering Sea.
The route serves Russia’s Arctic seaports and major Siberian river ports. It is used for transporting fuel, equipment and foodstuffs to the country's northern areas and for bringing back timber and minerals.
Alternative shipping lines to the Northern Sea Route run via the Suez and Panama canals. A vessel from Russia’s Murmansk traveling to Japan’s Yokohama via Suez will have to cover 12,800 nautical miles, compared to just 5,800 nautical miles along the Northern Sea Route.
The future of the Northern Sea Route
“Russia sees the future of the Northern Sea Route as an international transport artery competitive against the traditional maritime shipping lines,” former Prime Minister Vladimir Putin told the International Arctic Forum in Arkhangelsk in September 2011.
“It presents an excellent opportunity for cutting transportation costs,” said Putin. “Those governments and private companies that choose the Arctic transit route will receive economic advantages and dividends.”
Indeed, a shorter route means lower shipping costs, which are in direct proportion to the time the freight spends in transit.
Analyst Alexander Uvarov with the Atominfo news agency notes that the entire length of the Northern Sea Route is covered by a network of monitoring stations, which provide freight tracking at any point in transit.
“Once a network of emergency centers has been set up to ensure the safety of passing vessels, the Northern Sea Route will become even more popular with freight forwarders,” says Uvarov.
The popularity of the Northern Sea Route continues to grow: 46 vessels used its waterways last year, compared to 34 in 2011 and just four in 2010.
According to the Russian Federal Agency for Maritime and River Transport, about four million tons of freight was transported along the Northern Sea Route in 2012. This figure included 1.2 million tons of transit freight, which is 53 percent up on the 820,800 tons transported in 2011. The share of transit freight is set to grow by another five or six percent this year.
Ice remains the key impediment to the passage of vessels in the Arctic. Russia is beefing up its icebreaker fleet to support active shipping operations along the Northern Sea Route.
The vessels currently providing ice escort services along the Arctic route are the twin-reactor, nuclear-powered icebreakers (Rossiya, Sovetskiy Soyuz, Yamal and 50 Let Pobedy), the single-reactor, nuclear-powered, shallow-draft icebreakers (Taimyr and Vaigach), the nuclear-powered, icebreaking LASH carrier (Sevmorput), and five maintenance and repair vessels.
The current fleet of Russian, nuclear-powered icebreakers will continue in service until 2022–2025. It will gradually be replaced with three new, variable-draft, nuclear-powered icebreakers, which are scheduled to enter service by late 2017, 2019 and 2020.
All rights reserved by Rossiyskaya Gazeta.