Moscow and the West in battle of wills over Ukraine

Russian foreign policy experts are certain that sending in troops would be detrimental to Russia’s standing in the international community. Source: RIA Novosti

Russian foreign policy experts are certain that sending in troops would be detrimental to Russia’s standing in the international community. Source: RIA Novosti

Is the authorization from the Russian authorities for use of force in Ukraine a precursor to actual troop deployments, or just a threat meant to lead to talks?

The Federation Council, the upper house of Russia’s parliament, has authorized President Vladimir Putin to send troops to Ukraine, but should Putin decide to do so, the repercussions would be widely felt both domestically and abroad.

Gleb Pavlovsky, head of the Effective Policy Foundation, said that Putin asked for the authorization as a way to send a message to Ukraine and Western countries, and he has no intention of sending troops. However, Pavlovsky noted that the situation could change any minute. “Any street brawl may be interpreted as a threat to the Russian Black Sea Fleet,” Pavlovsky said.

Konstantin Kalachev, head of the Political Expert Group, also thinks the authorization was meant as a warning to the leadership in Kiev. “Moving forward, a lot will depend on the current leadership in Ukraine, on whether they will get Russia's message or decide to further exacerbate the tension. The message is: we have no intention of being passive onlookers. But this does not mean that the Russian leadership is ready to cross the red line. The Federation Council ruling should be seen as a prompt to serious talks,” Kalachev said.

Russian foreign policy experts are certain that sending in troops would be detrimental to Russia’s standing in the international community, however, they also think that Putin will not make a decision based on the opinion of foreign leaders.

“A considerable part of the international community would have an extremely negative reaction to Russia deciding to send its troops to Ukraine. But in this situation the head of state would have to be guided by national interests and values,” Alexei Chesnakov, head of the Center for Political Conjuncture, said.

Pavlovsky said that while Putin may be acting in what he considers the national interest, that there would also be domestic consequences for troop deployments. “Inside Russia, it would drive a wedge between the authorities and the middle class, who would not want to be paying for war or fighting in it.”

He added that any Russian troops would be a target for pro-Western Ukraizeta.runians. “Finding themselves on Ukrainian territory, where there is currently no state control in place, the Russian troops would become a ball that various forces will start to kick. Unidentified paramilitaries pelting Russian servicemen with Molotov cocktails risk nothing,” Pavlovsky said.

Konstantin Kalachev said that the Russian reaction would depend on the troops’ mandate. “If they are used just to control infrastructure facilities and ensure law and order, it is one story. If, as a result of acts of provocations, there are casualties on either side, it is a completely different story. In Crimea, Russian troops may be welcomed, whereas in other regions, including Kharkiv, the situation is not that clear-cut,” said Kalachev.

Alexei Chesnakov also said that seeing Russian troops on Ukrainian soil could contribute to further destabilization of the country: “Of course, the arrival of a Russian military contingent on Ukrainian territory could become a signal for the radicals to step up their activity, especially in the west and the center of the country. But that factor is unlikely to be the main one to influence the president in his decision-making process.”

Political analyst Stanislav Belkovsky believes that Russia’s threatened military involvement in the conflict is intended to benefit former Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko, who was recently released from prison. “I think that what we see is an agreed scenario for bringing Yulya Tymoshenko to power,” Belkovsky said. “She has a very good rapport with Putin, they are friends and partners. Tymoshenko wants to be the next president of Ukraine, but she is not popular with Maidan activists. Imagine that Tymoshenko now comes to the fore and resolves the situation with Russia. She becomes president. I am not 100 percent sure of this information, but it looks like a plausible theory to me.”

Kalachev said that right now, the overall situation in Ukraine is a battle of wills between Russia and the West, but there is only one scenario that will make Russia a pariah state over Ukraine. “As for the international consequences for Russia if it sends its troops to Ukraine, the winner will be the one who has stronger nerves,” Kalachev said. “Of course, there will be condemnation from the international community, in future however it would be possible to talk of an international peacekeeping operation in Ukraine. But this is not an issue for today, or even tomorrow. Russia may find itself in international isolation only in one case: if there is massive bloodshed in Ukraine.”

First published in Russian at

All rights reserved by Rossiyskaya Gazeta.

We've got more than 2 million followers on Facebook. Join them!

This website uses cookies. Click here to find out more.

Accept cookies