Lavrov and Kerry discuss coalition against ISIS in Vienna

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry (L) meets with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov at a hotel in Vienna, Austria June 30, 2015. Source: Reuters

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry (L) meets with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov at a hotel in Vienna, Austria June 30, 2015. Source: Reuters

The fight against terrorism in the Middle East was the main subject of discussion between Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry in Vienna on June 30. Having exchanged "concrete opinions," the ministers decided that consolidation is needed to effectively fight the Islamic State. However, some experts say that the two countries are not prepared for this.

A meeting between Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry was held on Tuesday, June 30 in Vienna. The central issue of this year's fourth meeting between the ministers was counteraction to the Islamic State in the Middle East.

The meeting had been organized by the leaders of Russia and the U.S., and as Lavrov had said earlier, its objective would be to exchange opinions on how "to unite the efforts of our two countries and other countries in the region more effectively" in the fight against Islamic State extremists.

Lavrov had also stated that in Vienna the Russian side intended to avoid rhetorical questions and be concrete and "push for joint practical actions." One of the proposals that the Russian Minister had expressed prior to the talks was the creation of a coalition composed of regional and non-regional players.


A questionable coalition

After more than two hours of talks, the exchange of "concrete opinions" had taken place, said Lavrov. Kerry agreed that "the situation in the region requires more active measures.” As had been expected, both ministers discussed ways of consolidating "all those who believe that ISIS is an absolute evil" and agreed to stop using questionable militant groups for tactical purposes.

However, it is not clear which "concrete" measures were agreed on. But in the view of Vitaly Naumkin, the director of the Middle East Institute at the Russian Academy of Sciences, the fact alone that the Russian and American presidents are sending their foreign ministers to talk about the issue is "a step forward."

"It means that there is mutual understanding, a common interest, which doesn't exist concerning Ukraine," Naumkin says.

Yet, it is very difficult to figure out what both sides are proposing. The first impediment is the U.S.'s reluctance to cooperate with the Syrian government and the second is either governments' lack of resolve to begin a political dialogue, remarks Naumkin, citing a recent statement made by Syrian Foreign Minister Walid Muallem in Moscow.

The distrust on the Syrian side was on display the day before the meeting in Vienna when Muallem held talks with Lavrov and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow. There Muallem said that, "the Americans are demanding a political solution but at the same time are allotting billions of dollars in the support of terrorists," referring to the various groups fighting in opposition to the official Syrian government, several of which Washington supports with non-lethal aid and training.

Additionally, the conflict between the authorities in Damascus and Turkey, which is demanding the resignation of the Syrian government, is casting doubts on the possibility of forming a coalition in the region.


A missed opportunity

Experts are unsure whether to expect concrete action in the fight against ISIS in the short term. The process of consolidation may become a long or a short-term one, notes Naumkin, since ISIS is advancing quickly and "this could push the disagreeing sides to embrace each other."

Other analysts interviewed by RBTH do not believe in the coalition. The coalition already exists - it is the U.S. and its satellites, and it is not working, says Alexei Mukhin, a political analyst and the general director of the independent Center for Political Information. "On the contrary, experts are noticing that it was the coalition's actions that had led to the expansion of ISIS's control over various territories," Mukhin said.

Deputy Dean of the World Economy and World Policy Department at the Higher School of Economics Andrei Suzdaltsev believes that while sanctions are in effect against Russia, it will never enter any coalition. In his words, ISIS is a consequence of America's policy in the Middle East. But to destroy it, America does not have enough strength.

"The anti-terrorist fight announced by Washington in 2001 was a complete failure," says Suzdaltsev. "But in those years America was fighting the underground, now it is fighting a terrorist state.”

Experts believe that schemes such as air raids and targeted strikes have also been unsuccessful. "The moment in which they could have worked is gone," says Mukhin. "Most likely the talks (between Lavrov and Kerry) were about the consolidated efforts against the mobilization of ISIS volunteers in various countries," adding that it is necessary to impose an economic blockade on ISIS. "While certain countries continue buying oil from ISIS, while weapons are flowing into ISIS territory, unfortunately it will be impossible to stop its expansion,” says Mukhin. “Perhaps this is what Kerry and Lavrov talked about."

All rights reserved by Rossiyskaya Gazeta.

This website uses cookies. Click here to find out more.

Accept cookies