Now, the Moscow demonstrators have turned to the “Occupy Wall Street” movement for inspiration and occupied the Chistye Prudy bouleverd. Source: Reuters
The worldwide “Occupy” movement has finally arrived in Moscow. As President Vladimir Putin settles into office, anti-Kremlin demonstrators are implementing new tactics to test the limits of their protests and the authorities’ tolerance. So far, they’ve succeeded – a central Moscow park has turned into a makeshift campsite and the new home base for the opposition movement. But how long will it last?
Putin’s inauguration on May 7 was preceded by an outbreak of violent and unprecedented protest action. Unlike the peaceful rallies of the winter, in which tens of thousands gathered to denounce the regime, the breakout of more aggressive protests on the eve of his lavish inauguration ceremony marked the beginning of a new, potentially darker chapter in the opposition movement. Yet in the following days, the anti-Kremlin demonstrators changed course and have since then attempted to implement a plan perhaps more familiar in Belarus, where stringent anti-demonstration laws have forced activists to resort to more clever tactics, such as setting off cell phone alarms or simply gathering in silence. And neither the earlier violent confrontations nor the seemingly senseless arrests of key leaders seemed to deter demonstrators from trying such new tactics.
Now, the Moscow demonstrators have turned to the “Occupy Wall Street” movement for inspiration. They have opted to gather without slogans, placards and anger – and with only their white ribbons and sleeping bags. Calling their event “Occupy Abai,” they have turned a statue of 19th century Kazakh poet Abai Kunanbayev, nestled inside the Chistye Prudy park, into their fortress. Each day, a handful of activists camp out overnight, while in the afternoons and evenings the park swells with participants and curious onlookers. There, volunteers give lectures on politics and history, ordinary demonstrators debate the future of the opposition, and a makeshift information center – staffed by a handful of university students – helps coordinate it all. Even given the relative inaction, it’s clear from the sea of white ribbons and the human collage of bespectacled intelligentsia why the crowds have gathered.
The tactic, though perhaps less visible and shocking than the sights of tens of
thousands chanting against Putin, seems to be sticking. And for the most part,
observers say, it provides few excuses for the police to become involved, since
the event isn’t a political rally and as such doesn’t require a permit from
City Hall. “If this was a protest, the OMON [riot police] officers would have
never left,” said opposition leader Boris Nemtsov, who has paid regular visits
to the site. “The authorities, by law, simply can’t do anything against it.”
This, perhaps, has been the most striking feature of the latest form of
demonstration. In stark contrast to the violent events of May 6, the
authorities have allowed members of the Abai crowd to largely do as they
please: organize song circles, stage public debates, and even make their beds
along the muddied grass that abuts the statue. The closest the event came to
confrontation was on Monday, when a group of riot police and regular officers
were dispatched to the area to urge the demonstrators to move their camp. After
an intervention by opposition activist Ilya Yashin, the occupiers and police reached
an unusually civil compromise to move their post further along the park. Yashin
later told reporters that activists had established a “dialogue” with police
and that as a show of good faith, they would cooperate with the authorities in
setting up a new zone.
So has the protest movement found a new outlet? It’s still unclear. A new mass
rally is reportedly planned for June 12, the otherwise little-acknowledged
Russia Day, and last weekend saw an estimated 10,000 people, led by a handful
of opposition-minded writers and artists, attend a largely undisturbed “stroll”
through central Moscow.
As for the Abai occupiers, they seem determined to hold strong for as long as
it takes, and when reminded by how the flagship “Occupy Wall Street” movement was finally
dispersed by the police, many remained unfazed – hardened, even – to the
prospect of future confrontation. Because while Moscow Mayor Sergei Sobyanin
has denied City Hall plans to break up the sit-in, Putin spokesman Dmitry
Peskov’s now-famous quote that “protesters should have their livers smeared on
the asphalt” for confronting the police nevertheless keeps many on their toes.
As 18-year-old university student Philip Galtsov, who helps coordinate the demonstration’s information center, patrolled the sparsely populated square on Monday afternoon announcing an afternoon lecture, he seemed to embody the rough-and-tumble spirit of many of the more seasoned participants. Through his dark mop, his eyes scanned the perimeter in cautious optimism. “Judging by the amount of people who have shown up and taken an interest here, I think you could say this is the future [of the protest movement],” he said, adjusting the rough-hewn military jacket he’s worn since he arrived several days ago. Yet he also raised a challenge, echoed by many other demonstrators, to opposition leaders in a sign that people are looking for more concrete action: “Personally, I think the strength of the movement really depends on whether it can address the more basic social issues that affect people’s everyday lives.”
First published in Russia Profile.
All rights reserved by Rossiyskaya Gazeta.