The love of church bells is inherent in every Russian, as famous Russian pianist Sergei Rachmaninoff once said. But would he believe that now people can hear the impressive toll of bells without the presence of a real bell ringer? Would he, or anyone for that matter, expect a robot to be in charge of summoning the people to the house of God?
We wouldn’t either, but it’s a reality. Around 700 churches in Russia are already equipped with so-called electronic bell ringers and their number is growing every year. Why is this happening and what does it mean for the Church?
According to the head of the International Center of Bell Art, Andrei Dyachkov, the very first electronic bell ringer was introduced in 2007 in the village of Ilyinskoye in the Moscow region. Basically it’s a small electronic block that controls the drives connected to the bells, imitating the hands and legs of a bell ringer - it wasn’t meant to be put into mass production.
As he explains, it wasn’t a completely new thing for Russian churches. Similar mechanisms existed as far back as the 17th century. During Peter the Great’s rule there was a European-made system called “samozvon” (selfringer) which worked in one of St. Petersburg’s churches.
“What we have now is an electronic bell ringer that can imitate a Russian bell toll like it’s played by a real bell ringer. It’s a hot trend,” Dyachkov says. “Before that there was a simpler mechanism called a ‘kuranti’ (a chime) that doesn’t have the ability to synchronize bells and adjust volume like an electronic bell ringer has.”
Like in the village of Ilyinskoye, where the first system was installed, the main role of the electronic bell ringer is to help churches without permanent bell ringers. The problem exists in many regions of Russia, especially given the active construction of new churches in the country. As officials say, there are already 40,000 churches in Russia with an average of three new churches appearing every day. (link in Russian). Given the lack of qualified personnel, robots can ensure bell ringing is being heard in every church.
The cost of these system isn’t cheap though. Compared to “kuranti” which are usually used to chime clocks, electronic bell ringers are twice as expensive. The prices start at 80,000 rubles ($1,270) for both, and can climb as high as 150,000 rubles ($2,540) for a “kuranti” system and 300,000 rubles ($4,770) for an electronic bell ringer system depending on the number of bells, says Dyachkov.
For this price the latter allows one to choose from dozens of available tolls remotely from a smartphone, without climbing up to the bells each time. The system can also be operated manually, in case a church gets a real bell ringer.
Andrei Dyachkov with the electronic bell ringer system, St. Isaac's Cathedral in St. Petersburgkolokola.ru
Professional bell ringers, like Lyubov Rudatskaya from the Kostroma region, are not thrilled by this new technology. She thinks it’s really strange to trust a mechanical system to act as a sacred voice for the church. “A bell ringer puts his feelings into the toll and accompanies it with a prayer. As practice shows, people feel this when they hear the bells ring. What emotions can a robot provoke?” she asks.
According to a poll by the Echo of Moscow radio station carried out in July (link in Russian), around 38 percent of respondents think that hearing a real bell ringer rather than a robot is important, while 52 percent don’t.
The official Orthodox Church doesn’t limit this trend either. Such technology is used not only in Russian churches but in Greece as well, Alexander Volkov, head of the Patriarchal press service, told Meduza. He says the issue is not money but a lack of qualified bell ringers: “This is a normal practice, especially in the regions, where there’s no opportunity to hire a real bell ringer.” (link in Russian)
Indeed, it often happens, even in Orthodox churches abroad, that bells are installed even when there’s no one to make use of them, shares Dyachkov. “The bells are silent. And in this cases the reaction is always positive when the technology helps them ring,” he adds.
On the other hand, he points out that there’s no substitute for a human bell ringer: “I never heard of such cases. Live sound is always better than mechanical sound and a human cannot be replaced. I hope that electronic bell ringers will be used wisely and, very much like phones, computers, and TV, they will never replace human communication.”
“During the Soviet period, the church bells were silenced and many of them were destroyed,” recalls William Brumfield, a historian of Russian architecture and professor of Slavic Studies at Tulane University (U.S.). “Now the bells are being restored and it’s understandable that the Church has approved the use of remote bell ringing. Bells are not there just for decoration. They should be heard. But it is preferable to hear human bell ringers, who play a central role as musicians and teachers.”
If using any of Russia Beyond's content, partly or in full, always provide an active hyperlink to the original material.
to our newsletter!
Get the week's best stories straight to your inbox