Victor Arnautoff's self-portrait against the background of his mural.Dick Evans (CC BY 4.0); Russian Museum
The modern U.S. is reconsidering its past in many ways, not without scandals – take removing the Confederate monuments in the southern states, for instance, which caused serious political clashes. In 2019, all of a sudden, a mural at San Francisco’s George Washington High School, painted by Russian-born Victor Arnautoff in 1936, tuned out to be a new bone of contention.
The thing is Arnautoff’s mural portrays the legacy of George Wahington, the country’s first President, pretty much as it was in reality: with black slaves surrounding him and a dead Native American lying on the ground, as pioneers march westward under his command.
George Washington portrayed by Arnautoff.Dick Evans (CC BY 4.0)
On July 2, 2019, the school board voted to destroy the mural on the premise that it may hurt the feelings of POC and Native American students. “It might be art and it can also be racist; it can be both,” said one of the board members. Those who are defending the mural and appealing the board’s decision believe that whitewashing history (and Washington being a slave owner is a historical fact) doesn’t help make society more inclusive and tolerant, as the former group believes.
The legal battle over this issue has the potential to stretch out for years, as is often the case.
Victor Aranautoff’s own life, however, can itself be considered the subject of much controversy. What was a Soviet painter doing painting murals in 1930s America anyways?
Self-portrait of 1941.Russian Museum
Like many distinguished Russians , Victor Arnautoff (1896 – 1979) had had to leave his native country during the revolution of 1917 and the civil war that followed it. Not everyone, though, was going out with such a bang: a squadron commander during WWI, Arnautoff ruthlessly fought against the Bolsheviks within the White Army, until its ultimate defeat in 1922.
After spending a couple of years in China as horse-riding instructor and calligrapher, in 1925 Arnautoff moved to the U.S., where he enrolled in the California School of Fine Arts and concentrated on improving his artistic skills. As it turned out, he was talented enough to become an assistant to Diego Rivera.
Diego Rivera.Archive photo
That Mexican painter, a devoted leftist, by that time had already been an international star. “He told me he doesn’t take apprentices but invited me to help him during his work – and one can learn a lot through beholding the whole process,” Arnautoff recalled. He spent two years, 1929-1931, in Mexico, working alongside Rivera.
“Arnautoff was impacted a lot, professionally and politically, by his Mexican master,” writes Irina Kudryavtseva, the head of the Modern Art Department at the Yekaterinburg Fine Arts Museum. “Hard work, talent and discipline (an officer’s training helped a lot) let Arnautoff become Rivera’s main assistant.”
In Mexico, under Rivera’s tutelage, Arnautoff perfected his skills at painting murals – and became a Communist, despite having fought them previously. This turnaround naturally created a lot of obstacles upon his return to San Francisco.
Victor Arnautoff and assistant Tom Hayes painting Coit Tower mural, 1934.San Francisco History Center, SF Public Library
Arnautoff’s professionalism and creative power were indisputable: he created several murals in San Francisco and the Bay Area in the 1930s, which still exist today. From 1938 to 1962, he worked as a professor at Stanford, teaching art.
Generally, his academic career was as successful as his artistic one. However, his political activities were sparking a lot of controversy in the U.S.Arnautoff became an ardent supporter of the leftist cause and the USSR. And while it was considered totally okay during Roosevelt – especially with Washington and Moscow fighting together against the Axis – the Cold War had changed all that.
City Life Mural at Coit Tower, by Arnautoff.Public domain
When the Second Red Scare hit, there was no way Arnautoff’s leanings were going to be ignored. The artist was interrogated by the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) and by several Stanford inner committees, unwilling to keep a Communist teaching there. “No proven Communist should hold a position at Stanford,” the university’s president Wallace Sterling used to say.
Self-portrait of 1950.
Arnautoff neither confirmed nor denied his membership in the Communist party, keeping a proud silence and bashing his opponents publically, while appealing for freedom of speech and thought. “Members of the Un-American Committee said I am a most dangerous man for the security of the United States… Do they consider an artist’s colors, brushes, crayons and pencils as murderous tools?” Arnautoff wrote. “If they do, it is a new low in right-wing thinking.”
Telegraph Hill: Department Store Coit Tower by Arnautoff.Wally Gobetz
Arnautoff wasn’t guilty of anything: no evidence he actually tried spreading any political views among his students was ever discovered. He kept his job, but McCarthyism dealt a strong blow to his opinion of the U.S. In 1963, after his wife died, Arnautoff moved to the USSR and worked there until his death in 1979. The communist artist would surely have been surprised to know that today it’s not right-wing fanatics, but American liberals, who try to erase his works from history.
If using any of Russia Beyond's content, partly or in full, always provide an active hyperlink to the original material.
to our newsletter!
Get the week's best stories straight to your inbox